Showing posts with label Erin Wasson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erin Wasson. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 December 2010

Erin Wass(going)on?


(Via Holy Moly)

I have questions.

Oh so many questions.

But, alas, I have no answers.

Friday, 6 November 2009

Burning The Midnight Oil


(Image via Mahalo Fashion)

Look! It's Erin Wasson! Poster girl for ladies who don't fancy brushing their hair and like leather and very thin t-shirts tucked haphazardly in to denim etc.

She looks like as sort of oil slicked mermaid doesn't she? And when I say that I mean it in a good way.

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

You're pulling my leg

(Image via RVCA)

After feeling positively prudish once you deemed my idea of a short skirt to be entirely decent I was curious as to whether you felt it was possible to go too short. That question hasn't been answered as we are discussing an absence rather than a brief presence but I do feel relieved that you have limits. I might get upset if I ever saw you sans bottom half, even though I wouldn't doubt for a second your ability to carry it off. I know that I find Lady Gaga's apparent allergy to bottoms amusing, but she's like a cartoon character so surely that isn't a double standard.

I am totally in agreement with you, though, if its got a denier rating on the pack it needs something to cover the essentials, surely. I had been wondering if I was developing Victorian sensibilities with my harsh judgements of all the bright young things flashing their smalls at every opportunity. But you are too (though maybe Edwardian in your case!) so I don't feel so bad. I do wish they would just put it all away.

Miss Wasson is a huge disappointment as I had just fallen in love with an RVCA dress of hers. But now that I know she wants to dress people in a way reminiscent of the kinky Nazi lady in 'Allo, 'Allo I will have to reevaluate my burgeoning love.

In denie(r)al


WTF? In fact so WTF that I originally typed WFT? THAT'S how baffled I am. What in God's name is going on here? First LiLo started wearing leggings aaaaaalllll the tiiiime. To everything and with everything. And often it just looked as though she had forgotten her pants. And then she brought out her own range of the things which is just, monumentally bizarre and I would prefer to gloss on that one. So then yesterday I was traipsing down Long Acre and saw a gal walking along and I almost stopped dead in my tracks. GOOD GRIEF I thought. The poor lamb, her skirt has ridden and she's flashing her gusset in such public a place! And then I realised that actually, she wasn't wearing anything that might even resemble a skirt. She was JUST wearing opaques with a plaid shirt. I could see her undercrackers Kerrina! THAT IS TOO SHEER A DENIER...surely?

What is going on? Why is it suddenly OK to sling on your tights and just, GO OUT? It's too too much man. Like, literally in a lot of cases. I can SEE too much. Larks lordy! And it must be a trend because my beloved Erin Wasson has put her own spin on things and is sending models out at RVCA with what can only be described as an overgrown pop sock attached to a granddad garter. If I see THAT outside H&M next week I swear, I'll get all Edwardian again and go clean in to a feint of horror.